From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965098AbVIIIvV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:51:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965097AbVIIIu5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:50:57 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:4792 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965098AbVIIIuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:50:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] add and handle NMI_VECTOR Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:50:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: "Jan Beulich" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <43207DFC0200007800024543@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <43207DFC0200007800024543@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509091050.01980.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 September 2005 18:07, Jan Beulich wrote: > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get > line wrapped.) > > Declare NMI_VECTOR and handle it in the IPI sending code. I would apply it now, but the attachment is empty. Can you resend? -Andi