From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965097AbVIIIvW (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:51:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965099AbVIIIu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:50:56 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:23438 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965097AbVIIIuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:50:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64 CFI annotation fixes and additions Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:50:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <43207A6302000078000244F4@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> <200509091040.11405.ak@suse.de> <4321688A020000780002481E@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <4321688A020000780002481E@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509091050.49112.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 09 September 2005 10:48, Jan Beulich wrote: > >The UNWIND_INFO part has still some problems - in particular it is > > lying > > >on all other architectures which don't check it yet. I made it > > dependent > > >on X86_64 right now. > > I don't think so. First, the i386 patch also adds the same (as I > indicated), and second this controls also the > -fasynchronous-exception-tables compiler flag, which should be > generically available on all architectures (the i386 patch adds this to > the top level makefile, x86-64 is somewhat special in requiring the > -fno- form to be used in the opposite case, which is why this ends up in > the arch-specific makefile). Well then I cannot apply it if the i386 patch doesn't go in first. I will remove these parts for now. -Andi