Re: 2.6.13-mm2

Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12T10:04:14Z

Hi,

On Sunday, 11 of September 2005 22:08, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> On Sunday 11 September 2005 21.36, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm2/
> > > >
> > > > (kernel.org propagation is slow. There's a temp copy at
> > > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.13-mm2.bz2)
> > >
> > > Could you please reintroduce the yenta-free_irq-on-suspend.patch (attached)
> > > into -mm? My box does not resume from disk without it.
> >
> > No probs.
> >
> > Daniel, do you remember why we decided to drop it? What should we do about
> > this? Thanks.
> >
>
> yeah, there was a long discussion about it. see:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112275164900002&r=1&w=4
> the reason being that it breaks APM suspend on Hugh Dickins' (added to cc:) laptop.
> Linus was quite clear about why reverting...
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112278810115252&w=4
>
> we should look at both problems in detail:
> - with APM it seems to break because the bridge gives interrupt before the
> handler is installed.
> - with ACPI i think some _other_ device gives the interrupts too early. but
> when all devices on the interrupt unregister the irq is disabled and the
> problem is hidden.
>
> i don't think we can do mutch about the APM case...
>
> so Rafael, your /proc/interrupts, lspci -vvv and dmesg, please.

rafael@albercik:~> cat /proc/interrupts

>
> rgds
> -daniel
>
>

--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"