public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: discuss@x86-64.org
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:16:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509100216.46247.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509091351_MC3-1-A9A7-F01A@compuserve.com>

On Friday 09 September 2005 19:50, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509091208350.6247@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
>
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 at 12:14:38 +0100 (BST), Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > It won't give more accurate backtraces, not even on i386 because
> > > show_stack doesn't have any code to follow frame pointers.
> >
> > Ah, right.
>
> What's this for, then? (arch/i386/kernel/traps.c line 116)

Ok someone added it when I wasn't looking. It certainly wasn't there some time
ago. However the point stands that x86-64 doesn't have such code.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-10  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-09 17:50 [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64 Chuck Ebbert
2005-09-10  0:16 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-08 16:04 Jan Beulich
2005-09-09  8:54 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-09-09  9:16   ` Jan Beulich
2005-09-09  9:23     ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09  9:40       ` Jan Beulich
2005-09-09 10:45         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-09-09 10:58           ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 11:14             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-09-09 11:21               ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 11:31                 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-09-09 11:42                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 12:00                     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-09-09 17:19             ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-09-10  5:13               ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  6:12                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 11:07       ` Philippe Elie
2005-09-09 11:19         ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 12:41         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200509100216.46247.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox