From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030402AbVIJAQt (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:16:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030403AbVIJAQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:16:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54948 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030402AbVIJAQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:16:48 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] allow CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for x86-64 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:16:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, Hugh Dickins , Jan Beulich , linux-kernel References: <200509091351_MC3-1-A9A7-F01A@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200509091351_MC3-1-A9A7-F01A@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509100216.46247.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 09 September 2005 19:50, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > In-Reply-To: > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 at 12:14:38 +0100 (BST), Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > It won't give more accurate backtraces, not even on i386 because > > > show_stack doesn't have any code to follow frame pointers. > > > > Ah, right. > > What's this for, then? (arch/i386/kernel/traps.c line 116) Ok someone added it when I wasn't looking. It certainly wasn't there some time ago. However the point stands that x86-64 doesn't have such code. -Andi