public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Mike Bell <mike@mikebell.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:52:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050910215254.GA15645@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050910082732.GR13742@mikebell.org>

On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:27:34AM -0700, Mike Bell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:45:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Also, if people _really_ are in love with the idea of an in-kernel
> > devfs, I have posted a patch that does this in about 300 lines of code,
> > called ndevfs.
> 
> Except that as I mentioned, it's broken by design. It creates yet
> another incompatible naming scheme for devices, and what's worse the
> devices it breaks are the ones like ALSA and the input subsystem, whose
> locations are hard-coded into libraries. Unless sysfs is going to get
> attributes from which the proper names could be derived, it won't ever
> work.

I didn't say it was a "nice" solution, fully LSB compliant and all.  All
it is is a solution that can work for some people, if they just want a
small, in-kernel devfs-like solution.

And it works just fine for alsa and input devices for me, just no
subdirs :)

Anyway, I'm not offering it up for inclusion in the kernel tree at all,
but for a proof-of-concept for those who were insisting that it was
impossible to keep a devfs-like patchset out of the main kernel tree
easily.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-10 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-09 21:45 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13 Greg KH
2005-09-10  8:27 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-10 21:52   ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-09-10 23:03     ` Mike Bell
2005-09-11  5:09       ` Greg KH
2005-09-12 13:40         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-09-14 20:00         ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:28           ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 23:06           ` Greg KH
2005-09-15  2:10             ` Ioan Ionita
2005-09-10  9:03 ` [GIT PATCH] " Michael Thonke
2005-09-10 12:32   ` Douglas McNaught
2005-09-10 21:55   ` Greg KH
2005-09-10 14:15 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:24 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:30   ` Greg KH
2005-09-11  0:48 ` David Lang
2005-09-11  3:07   ` Greg KH
2005-09-11  6:08     ` David Lang
2005-09-11  7:05       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-09-11  7:13       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-11  7:20         ` David Lang
2005-09-11 11:02           ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-09-12  8:01             ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-09-11 17:15           ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 11:35         ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-11 11:42           ` CaT
2005-09-11 17:17       ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-11 11:44 linux
2005-09-11 15:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 20:01   ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:13     ` Kyle Moffett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050910215254.GA15645@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike@mikebell.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox