From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:07:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050911030726.GA20462@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509101742300.28852@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:48:05PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:45:42 -0700
> >From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
> >To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
> >
> >Here are the same "delete devfs" patches that I submitted for 2.6.12.
> >It rips out all of devfs from the kernel and ends up saving a lot of
> >space. Since 2.6.13 came out, I have seen no complaints about the fact
> >that devfs was not able to be enabled anymore, and in fact, a lot of
> >different subsystems have already been deleting devfs support for a
> >while now, with apparently no complaints (due to the lack of users.)
>
> do you really think that there have been that many people who have shifted
> to 2.6.13 in less then 2 weeks since release?
Ok, how long should I wait then?
> I know that you take personal offense to this code existing, but Andrew
> pointed out when you proposed these patches before that we need to be
> acareful here
I know, that's fine. But if I don't keep trying, how will it ever
happen? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 21:45 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13 Greg KH
2005-09-10 8:27 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-10 21:52 ` Greg KH
2005-09-10 23:03 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-11 5:09 ` Greg KH
2005-09-12 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-09-14 20:00 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 23:06 ` Greg KH
2005-09-15 2:10 ` Ioan Ionita
2005-09-10 9:03 ` [GIT PATCH] " Michael Thonke
2005-09-10 12:32 ` Douglas McNaught
2005-09-10 21:55 ` Greg KH
2005-09-10 14:15 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:24 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 0:48 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 3:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-09-11 6:08 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 7:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-09-11 7:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-11 7:20 ` David Lang
2005-09-11 11:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-09-12 8:01 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-09-11 17:15 ` Greg KH
2005-09-11 11:35 ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-11 11:42 ` CaT
2005-09-11 17:17 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-11 11:44 linux
2005-09-11 15:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 20:01 ` Mike Bell
2005-09-14 20:13 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050911030726.GA20462@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox