From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 5/14] sas-class: sas_discover.c Discover process (end devices)
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:46:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050911094656.GC5429@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050910024454.20602.qmail@web51613.mail.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:44:54PM -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > this one completely duplicates the
> > mid-layer infrastructure for handling devices with Logical Units.
>
> No, it does *not*. James, you have _stop_ spreading FUD, relying
> that other people have not read the SCSI Core code.
>
> See here:
> SCSI Core has *no representation* of a SCSI Device with a
> SCSI Target Port.
struct scsi_target
> I've _clearly_ outlined that in the comments of the code,
> which you _conveniently_ did _not_ cut and paste here.
* Discover logical units present in the SCSI device. I'd like this
* to be moved to SCSI Core, but SCSI Core has no concept of a "SCSI
* device with a SCSI Target port". A SCSI device with a SCSI Target
* port is a device which the _transport_ found, but other than that,
* the transport has little or _no_ knowledge about the device.
* Ideally, a LLDD would register a "SCSI device with a SCSI Target
* port" with SCSI Core and then SCSI Core would do LU discovery of
* that device.
So what does this mean except "Luben tries to impress everyone with
standards gibberish, at the same time ignoring we soluitions that
work despite maybe not 100% elegant".
Sure, we'd like to move away from needing the ->id target id specifier.
But right now we need it, even you're code sets it in over-complicated
ways. But if you send a nice patch to get rid everyone will be happy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 19:40 [PATCH 2.6.13 5/14] sas-class: sas_discover.c Discover process (end devices) Luben Tuikov
2005-09-09 19:59 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-09 20:11 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-09 23:25 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-10 2:44 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-10 5:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-10 16:01 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 15:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 16:27 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 20:08 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 9:05 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-13 13:11 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 22:42 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 12:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14 17:13 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 17:17 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14 18:47 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-14 20:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 17:52 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 20:31 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 21:23 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 12:49 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 15:54 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 20:01 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-11 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-09-12 6:17 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-12 14:57 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 16:45 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 17:21 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 18:46 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-13 19:22 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 20:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 20:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-13 21:02 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 21:37 ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-13 21:54 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 22:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 5:22 ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-14 16:28 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 12:13 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14 4:57 ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-14 18:43 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-14 20:17 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-15 2:04 ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-12 20:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 20:09 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 19:39 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 18:17 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 10:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-13 12:47 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-13 14:58 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 22:39 ` Luben Tuikov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-12 19:04 James.Smart
2005-09-12 19:29 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 19:53 James.Smart
2005-09-14 0:58 Ravi Anand
2005-09-14 17:46 Ravi Anand
2005-09-16 7:28 Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050911094656.GC5429@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox