From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
Cc: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>,
Brad Tilley <rtilley@vt.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Universal method to start a script at boot
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:07:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050912110712.GA287@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509121249.40467.vda@ilport.com.ua>
Hi Denis :)
* Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua> dixit:
> Awful. This codifies ages-old Unix traditional SysV-like init
> and its derivatives, which should be get rid of instead.
I'm with you in this, in fact I use my own init system, but...
> daemontools are absolutely wonderful way of controlling daemons.
How the heck you make sure that svscan starts the services in the
correct order? Does it run the services in /services in any
particular order or just in the order resulting for a simple
globbing? How you make sure the services are shut down in any
particular order?
All this seems like requiring scripts to do the job (that is,
ensuring a particular order of startup/shutdown), while sysvinit
gets this info from filenames. Obviously, dictating the order using a
script is far more flexible than using filenames but it's not as
simple, and that cannot be seen in the comparisons D.J.B. does in the
homepage of daemontools (which, BTW, is the only source of
documentation, and a very poor one). LSB, on the other hand, is
better structured and although I don't like sysvinit at all, the
system is better documented. And I hate runlevels...
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1126462329.4324737923c2d@wmtest.cc.vt.edu>
2005-09-11 18:14 ` Universal method to start a script at boot Brad Tilley
2005-09-12 4:17 ` Michael Clark
2005-09-12 9:49 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-09-12 11:07 ` DervishD [this message]
2005-09-12 11:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-09-12 13:14 ` DervishD
2005-09-12 12:23 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-12 11:22 ` Michael Clark
2005-09-12 13:52 ` Brad Tilley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050912110712.GA287@DervishD \
--to=lkml@dervishd.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=rtilley@vt.edu \
--cc=vda@ilport.com.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox