public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	discuss@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: [1/3] Add 4GB DMA32 zone
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:51:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509121352.00530.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F01919BC3@otce2k03.adaptec.com>

Thanks Mark for the corrections.

On Monday 12 September 2005 13:44, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Andi Kleen writes:
> >> Adaptec AACRAID is one offender
> >
> > 4GB limit is really common and the oddballs like
> >these have to use the same workarounds (custom bounce buffer in low
>
> GFP_DMA
>
> >memory) they always did on machines with enough memory.
>
> The 2GB limit is to deal with allocation of hardware command frames
> (FIB) and thus only during initialization,
> all the adapters deliver DMA 
> to the full address range at 'run time' and the driver does open the
> limit up at that point. The reason for this strangeness is the inability
> of the Firmware to work around the Intel ATU when doing memcpy, where
> the DMA engine had no such limits.

Ok that makes a lot of sense.  You should probably be really using 
pci_alloc_consistent() instead of GFP_DMA directly here, but other than
that it should just work.

(pci_alloc_consistent has some hacks to first try the higher zones
and only use the lower zones if the allocation didn't succeed here -
on a 2GB machine you have a 50% chance that a normal allocation 
ends up below 1GB -  which make this all a bit more reliable) 

That probably explains the lack of reports about this issue
which I mistakenly assumed was because of the cards getting scarce.

Anyways, it shows the aacraid doesn't need GFP_DMA32 at all, which
is good.

I hope there are no other concerns about the patch and Linus 
could just merge it now? 

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-12 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-12 11:44 [1/3] Add 4GB DMA32 zone Salyzyn, Mark
2005-09-12 11:51 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-12 12:08 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-09-11 16:59 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 10:28 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-12 10:42   ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 11:33     ` Alan Cox
2005-09-12 11:22       ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 12:34         ` Alan Cox
2005-09-12 18:18       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-12 22:02         ` Bart Hartgers
2005-09-13  3:20           ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 19:55     ` Mark Lord
2005-09-12 12:45 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-12 12:46   ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 12:50     ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-12 12:54       ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 13:01         ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-13  9:15     ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-03 15:46 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200509121352.00530.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox