From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: discuss@x86-64.org
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com
Subject: Re: [discuss] [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:05:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509130605.31104.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912234532.GH19644@tuxdriver.com>
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:45, John W. Linville wrote:
> Call BUG() if DMA_NONE is passed-in as direction for sync_single.
> Also remove unnecessary checks for DMA_NONE in callers of sync_single.
>
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Hi - your changes look good, but you missed the 2.6.14 merge window now
so it'll be all 2.6.15 material. If you think there are any critical bug fixes
in there (I didn't there were any) please extract them only.
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-13 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 18:03 [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 18:09 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:33 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_single_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:40 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 1/6] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib to lib John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 2/6] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 3/6] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 5/6] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 6/6] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 19:51 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:53 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single John W. Linville
2005-09-12 20:23 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 23:45 ` [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] " John W. Linville
2005-09-12 23:59 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-13 4:05 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509130605.31104.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=iod00d@hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox