From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Josh Boyer <jdub@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missing #include <config.h>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050913152831.B23643@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1126620753.3209.3.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com>; from jdub@us.ibm.com on Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:12:33AM -0500
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:12:33AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:56 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > After spending some hours last night and this morning hunting a bug,
> > I've found that a different include order made a difference. Some
> > files don't work correctly, unless config.h is included before.
> >
> > Here is a very stupid bug checker for the problem class:
> > $ rgrep CONFIG include/ | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u > g1
> > $ rgrep CONFIG include/ | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | xargs grep "config.h" | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u > g2
> > $ diff -u g1 g2 | grep ^- > g3
>
> Your checker doesn't quite test for nested includes. E.g. if foo.h
> includes bar.h, and bar.h includes config.h, then foo.h doesn't need to
> include config.h explicitly.
Unfortunately, we don't operate like that. If a file makes use of
CONFIG_xxx then it must include <linux/config.h>.
We have "make configcheck" to help us find <linux/config.h> screwups.
Unfortunately, it seems from the output that no one runs it anymore.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-13 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-13 13:56 Missing #include <config.h> Jörn Engel
2005-09-13 14:08 ` Russell King
2005-09-13 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-13 17:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-09-13 18:02 ` Russell King
2005-09-13 14:50 ` [PATCH] Permanently fix kernel configuration include mess (was: Missing #include <config.h>) Russell King
2005-09-13 16:59 ` Joern Engel
2005-09-13 18:04 ` Russell King
2005-09-13 19:10 ` [PATCH] Permanently fix kernel configuration include mess Brian Gerst
2005-09-13 19:33 ` Josh Boyer
2005-09-13 20:10 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-09-14 8:39 ` [PATCH] Permanently fix kernel configuration include mess (was: Missing #include <config.h>) Andrew Morton
2005-09-14 8:48 ` Russell King
2005-09-14 13:48 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-14 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-14 17:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-09-13 14:12 ` Missing #include <config.h> Josh Boyer
2005-09-13 14:28 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-09-13 14:40 ` Josh Boyer
2005-09-13 16:22 ` Doug Maxey
2005-09-13 17:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050913152831.B23643@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jdub@us.ibm.com \
--cc=joern@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox