public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 5/14] sas-class: sas_discover.c Discover process (end devices)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:25:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050913222519.GA1308@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43273E6C.9050807@adaptec.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:02:36PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 09/13/05 16:36, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:23:42PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > 
> >>A SCSI LUN is not "u64 lun", it has never been and it will
> >>never be.
> >>
> >>A SCSI LUN is "u8 LUN[8]" -- it is this from the Application
> >>Layer down to the _transport layer_ (if you cared to look at
> >>_any_ LL transport).

Not all HBA drivers implement a mapping to a SCSI transport, we have
raid drivers and even an FC driver that has its own lun definition that
does not fit any SAM or SCSI spec.

I think the only HBA's today that can handle an 8 byte lun are lpfc and
iscsi (plus new SAS ones).

So, we can't have one "LUN" that fits all, and it makes no sense to call
it a LUN when it is really a wtf.

-- Patrick Mansfield

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-13 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-09 19:40 [PATCH 2.6.13 5/14] sas-class: sas_discover.c Discover process (end devices) Luben Tuikov
2005-09-09 19:59 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-09 20:11   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-09 23:25 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-10  2:44   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-10  5:39     ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-10 16:01     ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 15:06       ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 16:27         ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 20:08           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13  9:05           ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-13 13:11             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 22:42             ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 12:28               ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14 17:13                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 17:17                   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14 18:47               ` James Bottomley
2005-09-14 20:20                 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 17:52         ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 20:31           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 21:23             ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 12:49               ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 15:54                 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 20:01                   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-11  9:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-12  6:17       ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-12 14:57         ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 16:45           ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 17:21             ` James Bottomley
2005-09-12 18:46               ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-13 19:22                 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 20:23                   ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 20:36                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-13 21:02                       ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 21:37                         ` Stefan Richter
2005-09-13 21:54                           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 22:25                         ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2005-09-14  5:22                           ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-14 16:28                             ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-14 12:13                           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-14  4:57                       ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-14 18:43                         ` James Bottomley
2005-09-14 20:17                           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-15  2:04                           ` Sergey Panov
2005-09-12 20:20               ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 20:09             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 19:39           ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 18:17         ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-13 10:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-13 12:47           ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-09-13 14:58             ` Luben Tuikov
2005-09-12 22:39       ` Luben Tuikov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-12 19:04 James.Smart
2005-09-12 19:29 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-12 19:53 James.Smart
2005-09-14  0:58 Ravi Anand
2005-09-14 17:46 Ravi Anand
2005-09-16  7:28 Andreas Herrmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050913222519.GA1308@us.ibm.com \
    --to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
    --cc=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox