From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, dtor_core@ameritech.net, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, caphrim007@gmail.com,
david-b@pacbell.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Lost keyboard on Inspiron 8200 at 2.6.13
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:32:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050916223214.GA14637@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050916152432.5a05aeca.zaitcev@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:24:32PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:44:40 -0700, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:00:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Gwe, 2005-09-16 at 10:25 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > Only if we merge the code that does the handoff, with the same code that
> > does it in the usb core, would I feel more comfortable to enable this
> > always. I had a patch from David Brownell to do this, but it had some
> > link errors at times, so I had to drop it :(
>
> I see why you would want to merge them, but is it worth the trouble?
We've already divered from the original code, which was identical.
People forget to fix the other instance, when then change one of them.
> They are not identical. For one thing, early handoff installs its own
> fake interrupt handlers (Alan Cox insisted on it in the RHEL
> implementation).
The interrupt handlers aren't an issue. It's how the handoff happens at
a hardware level that is. I just want to make sure any changes made to
one place, make it to the other place.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-16 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-16 4:29 Lost keyboard on Inspiron 8200 at 2.6.13 Tim Rupp
2005-09-16 4:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-09-16 5:13 ` Tim Rupp
2005-09-16 9:53 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-16 15:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-09-16 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-16 18:44 ` Greg KH
2005-09-16 19:00 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-09-16 19:45 ` David Brownell
2005-09-16 22:24 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Pete Zaitcev
2005-09-16 22:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-09-16 23:54 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-17 4:12 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-17 8:08 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050916223214.GA14637@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=caphrim007@gmail.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox