public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	zwane@linuxpower.ca, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6 04/04] brsem: convert cpucontrol to brsem
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:46:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050925234603.GA3577@otto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4336542D.4000102@yahoo.com.au>

Nick Piggin wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> >+/*
> >+ * cpucontrol is a brsem used to synchronize cpu hotplug events.
> >+ * Invoking lock_cpu_hotplug() read-locks cpucontrol and no
> >+ * hotplugging events will occur until it's released.
> >+ *
> >+ * Unfortunately, brsem itself makes use of lock_cpu_hotplug() and
> >+ * performing brsem write-lock operations on cpucontrol deadlocks.
> >+ * This is avoided by...
> >+ *
> >+ * a. guaranteeing that cpu hotplug events won't occur during the
> >+ *    write-lock operations, and
> >+ *
> >+ * b. skipping lock_cpu_hotplug() inside brsem.
> >+ *
> >+ * #a is achieved by acquiring and releasing cpucontrol_mutex outside
> >+ * cpucontrol write-lock.  #b is achieved by skipping
> >+ * lock_cpu_hotplug() inside brsem if the current task is
> >+ * cpucontrol_mutex holder (is_cpu_hotplug_holder() test).
> >+ *
> >+ * Also, note that cpucontrol is first initialized with
> >+ * BRSEM_BYPASS_INITIALIZER and then initialized again with
> >+ * __create_brsem() instead of simply using create_brsem().  This is
> >+ * necessary as cpucontrol brsem gets used way before brsem subsystem
> >+ * becomes up and running.
> >+ *
> >+ * Until brsem is properly initialized, all brsem ops succeed
> >+ * unconditionally.  cpucontrol becomes operational only after
> >+ * cpucontrol_init() is finished, which should be called after
> >+ * brsem_init_early().
> >+ */
> 
> Mmm, this is just insane IMO.
> 
> Note that I happen to also think the idea (brsems) have merit, and
> that cpucontrol may be one of the places where a sane implementation
> would actually be useful... but at least when you're introducing
> this kind of complexity anywhere, you *really* need to be able to
> back it up with numbers.

The only performance-related complaint with cpu hotplug of which I'm
aware -- that taking a cpu down on a large system can be painfully
slow -- resides in the "write side" of the code, which is not the case
that the brsem implementation optimizes.  I think this patch would
make that case even worse.  So I don't think it's appropriate to use a
brsem for cpu hotplug, especially without trying rwsem first.


Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-25 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25  6:43 [PATCH linux-2.6 00/04] brsem: [RFC] big reader semaphore Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 01/04] brsem: implement " Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:19   ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:11     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  8:27       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:53         ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  9:24           ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25 10:05             ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 11:22               ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 02/04] brsem: convert super_block->s_umount to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 03/04] brsem: fix ro-remount <-> open race condition Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 04/04] brsem: convert cpucontrol to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:39   ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 23:46     ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2005-09-26  1:11       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-26  4:05         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050925234603.GA3577@otto \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox