public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:07:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509290007.33686.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050928210717.5CF71E372B@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>

On Wednesday 28 September 2005 23.07, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > ok. i didn't look too close, but i think ohci-hcd does not fully disable
> > > > interrupts in it's suspend callback...needs a closer look.
> > > > cc:ing linux-usb-devel...
> > > 
> > > It's handled in hcd-pci.c ... All PCI based HCDs release their IRQs
> > > when they suspend.  Including OHCI.  Your diagnosis is incorrect.
> >
> > would you be kind enough to tell me where?
> 
> There's only one free_irq() line, and it gets called the first time
> through usb_hcd_pci_suspend().  QED.

errm yes. that's the one my test patch commented out. but that was really
not what i was asking/telling. so again:
to me it looks like ohci-hcd does not fully disable interrupts on suspend.
disable (read: tell the hardware not to generate interrupts anymore), not
releasing the handler.

> 
> 
> > my point is: the test patch i sent to rafael which comments out the
> > free_irq-on-suspend thing in hcd-pci.c shows that something is wrong with
> > USB (i think only OHCI. UHCI looks ok and about EHCI i have no data). 
> 
> Your logic escapes me, since your patch affected all three PCI HCDs.
> If that's wrong for one, its wrong for all three.

to me it seems there is code in uhci-hcd that tells the hardware not
to generate interrupts anymore. for ohci i think this is missing and
for ehci i simply didn't bother to check at all.

> 
> And as I just commented to Rafael, here are two better things to try
> instead of believing a diagnosis that's clearly wrong:
> 
>   - 2.6.14-rc2 
>   - disabling USB keyboard/mouse/... support in your BIOS
> 
> I know there are bugs in the "usb-handoff" PCI quirk code; the folk who've
> collected those code fragments didn't bother to match the code in the HCDs,
> and the differences can matter [1].  The best way to avoid such stuff is
> still to make sure that your BIOS just ignores USB.
> 
> - Dave
> 
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=112745488924651&w=2
> 
> 
rgds
-daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-28 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-08 12:30 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 13:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Benoit Boissinot
2005-09-08 13:48 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-08 14:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-09  0:39   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 10:41     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 10:46       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-08 15:11 ` 2.6.13-mm2 high memory support borken? Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-09  9:29   ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 17:20 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-08 19:39   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  7:02     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-09  1:47 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-09  9:43   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 13:45     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-10  6:33       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Marko Kohtala
2005-09-09  2:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 - drivers/char/speakup/speakup doesn't compile (+warnings from other things) Damir Perisa
2005-09-09 12:18   ` Alan Cox
2005-09-09 20:57 ` 2.6.13-mm2 (general protection fault) Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 11:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 12:42   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 13:46     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 20:21       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 21:26       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 18:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 22:12   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 23:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:56   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11  0:07     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11  0:49       ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  0:58         ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  1:03           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11  1:22             ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  1:25               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 17:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 19:36   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 20:03     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-12 19:19       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 20:08     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-12 10:04       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:06       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:09         ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-18 21:49           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-19  3:07             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-19 15:56               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-23 16:52             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:05               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 20:23                 ` [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.13-mm2 David Brownell
2005-09-28 20:37                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:56                     ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:34                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:04                         ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 22:32                           ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-29  0:09                             ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 15:36                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-29 16:31                                 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 19:39                                 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-30 16:33                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 17:48                                 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29  2:54                             ` Alan Stern
2005-09-28 20:45                   ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 21:07                     ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:47                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:07                       ` Daniel Ritz [this message]
2005-09-28 21:10                     ` Alan Stern
2005-09-29 15:22                 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12  3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  5:01   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12  6:09     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  7:16       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:06     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 18:19       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-09-12 18:51       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 22:46         ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-13  0:08           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-13  4:00             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  3:10 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200509290007.33686.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
    --to=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox