From: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509290007.33686.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050928210717.5CF71E372B@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 23.07, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > ok. i didn't look too close, but i think ohci-hcd does not fully disable
> > > > interrupts in it's suspend callback...needs a closer look.
> > > > cc:ing linux-usb-devel...
> > >
> > > It's handled in hcd-pci.c ... All PCI based HCDs release their IRQs
> > > when they suspend. Including OHCI. Your diagnosis is incorrect.
> >
> > would you be kind enough to tell me where?
>
> There's only one free_irq() line, and it gets called the first time
> through usb_hcd_pci_suspend(). QED.
errm yes. that's the one my test patch commented out. but that was really
not what i was asking/telling. so again:
to me it looks like ohci-hcd does not fully disable interrupts on suspend.
disable (read: tell the hardware not to generate interrupts anymore), not
releasing the handler.
>
>
> > my point is: the test patch i sent to rafael which comments out the
> > free_irq-on-suspend thing in hcd-pci.c shows that something is wrong with
> > USB (i think only OHCI. UHCI looks ok and about EHCI i have no data).
>
> Your logic escapes me, since your patch affected all three PCI HCDs.
> If that's wrong for one, its wrong for all three.
to me it seems there is code in uhci-hcd that tells the hardware not
to generate interrupts anymore. for ohci i think this is missing and
for ehci i simply didn't bother to check at all.
>
> And as I just commented to Rafael, here are two better things to try
> instead of believing a diagnosis that's clearly wrong:
>
> - 2.6.14-rc2
> - disabling USB keyboard/mouse/... support in your BIOS
>
> I know there are bugs in the "usb-handoff" PCI quirk code; the folk who've
> collected those code fragments didn't bother to match the code in the HCDs,
> and the differences can matter [1]. The best way to avoid such stuff is
> still to make sure that your BIOS just ignores USB.
>
> - Dave
>
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=112745488924651&w=2
>
>
rgds
-daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-28 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 12:30 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 13:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Benoit Boissinot
2005-09-08 13:48 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-08 14:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-09 0:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 10:41 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 10:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-08 15:11 ` 2.6.13-mm2 high memory support borken? Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-09 9:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 17:20 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-08 19:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 7:02 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-09 1:47 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-09 9:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 13:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-10 6:33 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Marko Kohtala
2005-09-09 2:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 - drivers/char/speakup/speakup doesn't compile (+warnings from other things) Damir Perisa
2005-09-09 12:18 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-09 20:57 ` 2.6.13-mm2 (general protection fault) Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 11:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 12:42 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 13:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 20:21 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 21:26 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 18:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 22:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 23:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 0:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 0:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 0:58 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 1:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:25 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 17:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 19:36 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 20:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-12 19:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 20:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-12 10:04 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-18 21:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-19 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-19 15:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-23 16:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:05 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 20:23 ` [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.13-mm2 David Brownell
2005-09-28 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:56 ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:04 ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 22:32 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-29 0:09 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-29 16:31 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 19:39 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-30 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 17:48 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 2:54 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-28 20:45 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 21:07 ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:07 ` Daniel Ritz [this message]
2005-09-28 21:10 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-29 15:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 5:01 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 6:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 7:16 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 18:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 22:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-13 0:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-13 4:00 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 3:10 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509290007.33686.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--to=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox