From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932092AbVI2GbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:31:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932098AbVI2GbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:31:15 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:5814 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932092AbVI2GbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:31:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:31:14 +0100 From: Al Viro To: linux-sh@m17n.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] breakage either in arch/sh/Kconfig or arch/sh/kernel/process.c? Message-ID: <20050929063114.GT7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20050929061239.GS7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050929061239.GS7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:12:39AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > set. Now, in arch/sh/Kconfig we see that SH_FPU depends on !CPU_SH3 and SH_DSP > on !CPU_SH4. Which leaves CPU_SH2 picking both options. > > Comments? Looks like either Kconfig or flush_thread() needs fixing... And that would be Kconfig, from the look of it. Any suggestions on the dependencies?