From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932175AbVJCImc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:42:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932185AbVJCImc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:42:32 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:30859 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932175AbVJCImc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:42:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 01:42:01 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com, coywolf@gmail.com, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better Message-Id: <20051003014201.130abcef.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1128327126.14695.40.camel@twins> References: <20051003072910.14726.10100.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <1128327126.14695.40.camel@twins> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter wrote: > On that last sentence, does quilt support having different subjects for > different patches? I'm missing a step in your thinking here - what does quilt have to do with patch subjects? I use quilt, but I don't use it to send patches. To send patches, I use sendpatchset: http://www.speakeasy.org/~pj99/sgi/sendpatchset -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401