public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /etc/mtab and per-process namespaces
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:43:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051004194301.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60510041214t3afd803re27b742705d27900@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:14:47PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
> Hmm no responses on this thread a couple days now.  I guess:
> 
> 1) No one cares about private namespaces or the fact that they make
> /etc/mtab totally inconsistent.
> 2) Private Namespaces aren't important to anyone and will never be
> robust unless someone who cares, like me, takes it over somehow.
> 3) Everyone is busy with their own shit and doesn't want to deal with
> me or mine right now.

4) If you insist on having /etc/mtab the same file in all namespaces,
you obviously will have its contents not matching at least some
of them.  Either have it separate in each namespace where you want
to see it, or simply use /proc/self/mounts instead.

BTW, "private" is an odd term - they are all on the same footing; "system"
one is just the namespace of init (and those of its descendents that share
the namespace with it).  Nothing special about it...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-04 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-02 22:08 /etc/mtab and per-process namespaces David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:14 ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-04 19:49     ` Michael Tokarev
2005-10-04 19:52     ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:43   ` Al Viro [this message]
2005-10-04 20:07     ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 20:20       ` Al Viro
2005-10-05 16:29   ` Ram
2005-10-14  2:10     ` Mike Waychison
2005-10-17  0:47       ` Ian Kent
2005-10-20  3:53         ` Rob Landley
2005-10-20  3:42 ` Rob Landley
     [not found] <4TkbZ-6KJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4U0uy-33E-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <4U0XK-3Gp-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-04 21:20     ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-05  0:14       ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-22 13:23 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2005-10-29  0:06 ` Ram Pai
2005-10-29 10:16   ` Rob Landley
2005-10-31 19:11     ` Ram Pai
2005-10-31 23:27       ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01  0:01         ` Ram Pai
2005-11-01  7:36         ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-01  8:44           ` Rob Landley
     [not found] <50rBX-76N-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <50rBX-76N-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-22 17:26   ` Bodo Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051004194301.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=leimy2k@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox