Re: what's next for the linux kernel?

[Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>]

On Wed, Oct 05 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:40:43PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:31:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > 
> > > > [i know better criticism and accusations deleted and not commented on]
> > > 
> > > > Why is that so hard to understand? Succesful contributions start at the
> > > > technical level, always have.
> > >  
> > >  then we will have to agree to disagree, because i believe that
> > >  successful contributions start with "what creative thing shall
> > >  we do now / what problem shall we tackle today in a creative
> > >  way?" and work their way down to the technical level, which,
> > >  as you rightly point out, requires successful _technical_
> > >  contributions.
> > 
> > It's not my opinion, I'm stating historical fact. I honestly can't
> > remember when a succesfull contribution was made based on a long
> > non-technical thread. I can, however, remember oodles of cases where the
> > reverse is quite true.
>  
>  ah.
> 
>  who's hosting the linux-visionaries mailing list, then?

:-)

Don't think there is one, but if it will take the traffic of this list,
I'm sure davem can be quickly convinced to add one!

-- 
Jens Axboe