From: Pierre Michon <pierre@no-spam.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:57:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051005175732.GA2333@linux.ensimag.fr> (raw)
Hi,
>Not complex enough so that a network boot protocol can't fit on a BIOS
>chip, believe me.
So _why_ the freebox act _differently_ in the boot process when there is
a firmware update ?
Just for the fun ?
> he only wrong assumptions that I see here are yours.
I provide facts and arguments, you provide nothing.
>I don't understand why you cannot accept that the Freebox is part of the
>Free network infrastructure and that you are not using directly the OS
>but only the service that they provide.
So what about _my_ wifi pcmcia card ?
What about the people who had to paid 400 euros and receive a letter
from free telling them that according to CGV there are the onwer of the
freebox (ok this one need some checks).
Again in my first post I provide facts for this (with links), you provide
nothing than replying always the same things without arguments against
mine.
Please take my first post and reply to point A, B, C with arguments.
>'Got it, now ?
No, because you didn't answer to my questions...
Pierre
Please let's continue on legal gpl-violations.org ML.
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-05 17:57 Pierre Michon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-06 23:26 freebox possible GPL violation Pierre Michon
2005-10-06 12:01 Pierre Michon
2005-10-06 13:06 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 13:40 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-06 14:48 ` Matan Peled
2005-10-05 16:06 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 16:47 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 15:18 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 15:49 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-10-05 15:12 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 15:08 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 11:13 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 11:22 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 11:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 11:37 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 12:02 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 12:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 12:29 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 12:45 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-05 17:11 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-10-06 0:07 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 0:49 ` David Lang
2005-10-06 1:12 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-10-06 2:25 ` David Lang
2005-10-06 9:20 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 9:51 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 9:53 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 11:39 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 13:05 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 13:42 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-06 14:19 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 20:15 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-10-11 2:27 ` David Schwartz
2005-10-11 10:48 ` Graham Murray
2005-10-05 12:15 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-10-05 11:45 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-05 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 11:50 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 10:08 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 10:18 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 8:47 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 9:42 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-15 9:40 ` Loic Dachary
2005-10-19 17:58 ` Pierre Michon
2005-10-20 15:29 ` Loic Dachary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051005175732.GA2333@linux.ensimag.fr \
--to=pierre@no-spam.org \
--cc=434403B1.8000506@cs.aau.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox