From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030432AbVJGPlr (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:41:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030442AbVJGPlr (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:41:47 -0400 Received: from agmk.net ([217.73.31.34]:3857 "EHLO mail.agmk.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030432AbVJGPlr (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:41:47 -0400 From: =?utf-8?q?Pawe=C5=82_Sikora?= To: Horst von Brand Subject: Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc). Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:41:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200510071533.j97FX9Wp018589@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> In-Reply-To: <200510071533.j97FX9Wp018589@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510071741.41929.pluto@agmk.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dnia piątek, 7 października 2005 17:33, Horst von Brand napisał: > Paweł Sikora wrote: > > Dnia piątek, 7 października 2005 15:46, Horst von Brand napisał: > > [...] > > > > binutils-2.16.91.0.2-4 doesn't. It looks like you are using broken > > > tools. > > > > I didn't say that is (or not) a binutils bug. > > I'm only saying that kernel is killng a valid micro application. > > If binutils generates an invalid executable, it is not a valid application. ehh, please look again at my first post :) binutils-2.16 generates VALID app with .text/.interp and *without* .bss. kernel always calls padzero() for the .bss section inside load_elf_binary(). finally it kills a valid app. did i miss something? -- The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke