From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750804AbVJJIZK (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:25:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750809AbVJJIZK (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:25:10 -0400 Received: from calypso.frankengul.org ([62.212.121.50]:53149 "EHLO calypso.frankengul.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804AbVJJIZJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:25:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:25:07 +0200 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sparc64 U60: no iptables Message-ID: <20051010082507.GA5157@frankengul.org> References: <4347A731.7010509@frankengul.org> <4348EFF4.3040305@frankengul.org> <4349614F.1010408@frankengul.org> <20051009.202646.70198053.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051009.202646.70198053.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: seb@frankengul.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:26:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Sébastien Bernard > Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:28:31 +0200 > > > Can one explain me why this patch works on other archs, and oops on the > > sparc64 smp ? > > Can one explain why I'm the only one to have this problem ? > > On your Ultra60 the two physical cpus are numbered "0" and "2". > Thanks for the information. Indeed they are. Does the patch assume that cpus are numbered in a row ? Now, I reverted the patch for ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c and ebtables.c. Everything is working ok (11h uptime). Is this problem specific to the Ultra 60 or sparc arch ? Will a proper fix be issued for our machines ? Seb