From: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>,
airlied@linux.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nesting class_device in sysfs to solve world peace
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:00:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011040028.GA21135@neo.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509300032.50408.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:32:49AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> I firmly believe that creating sub-classes (which solves hotplug issues)
> and linking sub-class devices to their parent via 'device' link, much like
> we link top-level class device to their physical parent devices (which
> solves 2, 3 and 4) is much cleanier way. It provides everything that your
> implementation does plus allows different views useful for other tasks
> besides udev.
Hi Dmitry,
Could you please outline the class device requirements for the input
subsystem? Specifically I'm interested in the class -> subclass layering.
I'm trying to understand what is needed and how the input subsystem should
be structured.
I can think of other subystems that might benefit from class layering. One
example might be wireless cards: net and net/wireless. In this case devices
that belong to class "wireless" would inherit all of the capabilities of the
"net" class and also implement the "wireless"-specific feature set.
Thanks,
Adam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-28 23:31 [PATCH] nesting class_device in sysfs to solve world peace Greg KH
2005-09-30 5:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-10-06 0:09 ` Greg KH
2005-10-06 0:26 ` Greg KH
2005-10-06 0:29 ` Greg KH
2005-10-06 6:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-10-06 12:00 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-10-06 17:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-10-06 21:22 ` Greg KH
2005-10-06 21:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-10-11 4:00 ` Adam Belay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011040028.GA21135@neo.rr.com \
--to=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox