From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@linux.kernel.org,
vendor-sec@lst.de
Subject: Re: [vendor-sec] Re: [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:10:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011231054.GA16315@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051011094550.GI4290@rama>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:45:51AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:07:45AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Harald Welte (laforge@gnumonks.org) wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> > > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > > @@ -1193,6 +1193,40 @@ kill_proc_info(int sig, struct siginfo *
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* like kill_proc_info(), but doesn't use uid/euid of "current" */
> >
> > Maybe additional comment reminding that you most likely don't want this
> > interface.
> >
> > Also, looks like there's same issue again:
>
> Mh, didn't hit that bug since I don't use disconnect signals. But it
> looks like it has the same issue.
>
> Please consider the patch below, it
>
> 1) changes pid_t to uid_t
> 2) exports the symbol
> 3) adresses the same task_struct referencing issue for disconnect
> signals
>
> I hope this now finally is the last take ;)
Ugh, but it looks like Linus already committed your previous patch, with
some changes by him. Care to send a delta from what is currently in his
tree (2.6.14-rc4 has it) and this patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 15:13 [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Harald Welte
2005-09-27 8:04 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 9:13 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20050927110319.GD1980@piware.de>
2005-09-27 12:22 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:48 ` [vendor-sec] " Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 12:57 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 13:09 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 15:27 ` David Brownell
2005-09-27 14:53 ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:00 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:52 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 10:47 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 18:44 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 20:38 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 22:08 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 17:44 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-10 18:07 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-11 9:45 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 23:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-10-11 23:44 ` [vendor-sec] " Linus Torvalds
2005-10-12 7:24 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-13 5:51 ` Horms
2005-10-11 13:57 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 22:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-10 20:03 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-10-11 8:28 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-11 17:58 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-11 19:13 ` Alan Stern
2005-10-11 20:02 ` [Security] " Alan Cox
2005-09-27 17:20 ` PID reuse safety for userspace apps (Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio) Solar Designer
2005-09-27 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-27 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 21:16 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 21:03 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 16:58 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Alan Cox
2005-09-27 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 20:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-13 23:00 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-10-13 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-13 23:56 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011231054.GA16315@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=security@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vendor-sec@lst.de \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox