public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: george@mvista.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	dwalker@mvista.com, david singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc4-rt1
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:04:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051014040432.GA9073@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1129160470.4633.6.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu>


* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

> > Or maybe:
> > 'time sleep 10'
> > 
> > Lets the machine time it.
> 
> My first thought was "this can't work" as I imagined the same timing 
> services would be used and you would get always 10 secs or so...

yeah, was my initial thought too. If you have an ssh login on any other 
local box (and have ssh autologin enabled), then there's a good way to 
script this:

	time ssh otherbox "time ssh thisbox \"sleep 10\""

this way you'll get two time measurements of the same timeout, one on 
the other box (which shouldnt be running the buggy kernel :-), one on 
this box, while the timer runs on this box. Here it gives:

earth3:~> time ssh pluto "time ssh earth3 \"sleep 10\""

real    0m10.141s
user    0m0.012s
sys     0m0.008s

real    0m10.278s
user    0m0.024s
sys     0m0.004s

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-14  4:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-11 11:14 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-11 16:03 ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-11 20:55 ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-11 21:08   ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-11 21:13     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-11 21:21       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-11 22:23         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 16:37         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 17:48           ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-12 18:00             ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 18:25               ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-12 18:38                 ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-12 19:11                   ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 19:41                     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Mark Knecht
2005-10-12 19:45                       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-12 19:52                       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Lee Revell
2005-10-12  6:14   ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-12  6:16     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-12  6:33     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2005-10-12 22:08       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 George Anzinger
2005-10-12 23:41         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-12 23:52           ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 George Anzinger
2005-10-14  4:04           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-10-12  7:10     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-13 22:29       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-14  2:28         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-14  4:56           ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14  6:15             ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14  8:53               ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14 18:01               ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-14 18:35                 ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-14 19:05             ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-10-14  3:56         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-12 16:42 ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-14  6:22   ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14  9:57     ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Andi Kleen
2005-10-14 13:12       ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14 19:24         ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-14  6:22   ` 2.6.14-rc4-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-13 21:14 ` 1.6ms jitter in rtc_wakeup (Re: 2.6.14-rc4-rt1) Esben Nielsen
2005-10-14  3:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-14 21:32     ` Esben Nielsen
2005-10-19  7:52       ` Esben Nielsen
2005-10-19 16:04         ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-10-19 18:07           ` ktimer hiccup in rt11 David Singleton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051014040432.GA9073@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox