* [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro
@ 2005-10-15 23:51 Al Viro
2005-10-16 7:16 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2005-10-15 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-kernel
... otherwise, things like alpha and sparc64 break and break
badly. They define cpu_possible_map to something else in smp.h
*AFTER* having included cpumask.h.
If that puppy is a macro, expansion will happen at the actual
caller, when we'd already seen #define cpu_possible_map ... and we will
get the right thing used.
As an inline helper it will be tokenized before we get to that
define and that's it; no matter what we define later, it won't affect
anything. We get modules with dependency on cpu_possible_map instead
of the right symbol (phys_cpu_present_map in case of sparc64), or outright
link errors if they are built-in.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
----
diff -urN RC14-rc4-git4-base/include/linux/cpumask.h current/include/linux/cpumask.h
--- RC14-rc4-git4-base/include/linux/cpumask.h 2005-10-15 16:21:34.000000000 -0400
+++ current/include/linux/cpumask.h 2005-10-15 19:46:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -393,15 +393,13 @@
#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu_mask((cpu), cpu_present_map)
/* Find the highest possible smp_processor_id() */
-static inline unsigned int highest_possible_processor_id(void)
-{
- unsigned int cpu, highest = 0;
-
- for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_possible_map)
- highest = cpu;
-
- return highest;
-}
+#define highest_possible_processor_id() \
+({ \
+ unsigned int cpu, highest = 0; \
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_possible_map) \
+ highest = cpu; \
+ highest; \
+})
#endif /* __LINUX_CPUMASK_H */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro
2005-10-15 23:51 [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro Al Viro
@ 2005-10-16 7:16 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-16 7:43 ` Herbert Xu
2005-10-16 7:46 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2005-10-16 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:51:12 +0100
> ... otherwise, things like alpha and sparc64 break and break
> badly. They define cpu_possible_map to something else in smp.h
> *AFTER* having included cpumask.h.
So ugly...
But, it's the best fix for now.
Longer term we might want to make an asm/cpumask.h that can
help allow the platforms to cleanly say "well, mask X is
equivalent to Y, so only instantiate X and define Y to X"
which is all that these two platforms are trying to accomplish.
If you don't support cpu hotplug, present == possible afterall.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro
2005-10-16 7:16 ` David S. Miller
@ 2005-10-16 7:43 ` Herbert Xu
2005-10-16 7:46 ` Al Viro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2005-10-16 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: viro, torvalds, linux-kernel
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> So ugly...
>
> But, it's the best fix for now.
>
> Longer term we might want to make an asm/cpumask.h that can
> help allow the platforms to cleanly say "well, mask X is
> equivalent to Y, so only instantiate X and define Y to X"
> which is all that these two platforms are trying to accomplish.
The other thing you could is have an inline function called
highest_processor_id (or perhaps last_cpu) that calculates the
biggest CPU ID for any map and then define highest_possible_processor_id
as a macro that just calls the function with the right arguments.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro
2005-10-16 7:16 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-16 7:43 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2005-10-16 7:46 ` Al Viro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2005-10-16 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:16:49AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:51:12 +0100
>
> > ... otherwise, things like alpha and sparc64 break and break
> > badly. They define cpu_possible_map to something else in smp.h
> > *AFTER* having included cpumask.h.
>
> So ugly...
>
> But, it's the best fix for now.
>
> Longer term we might want to make an asm/cpumask.h that can
> help allow the platforms to cleanly say "well, mask X is
> equivalent to Y, so only instantiate X and define Y to X"
Indeed, but playing with moving stuff from smp.h is definitely post-2.6.14
fodder...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-16 7:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-15 23:51 [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro Al Viro
2005-10-16 7:16 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-16 7:43 ` Herbert Xu
2005-10-16 7:46 ` Al Viro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox