public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khali@linux-fr.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: Re: VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:24:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051017115400.GC6257@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510161919450.23590@g5.osdl.org>

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:34:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > 
> > Linus, I don't think this has anything to do with RCU grace periods
> > like we discussed previously. I measured on my 3.6GHz x86_64 and
> > found that open()/close() pair on /dev/null takes about 45500
> > cycles or 12 microseconds. [Does that sound resonable?].
> 
> That sounds very slow. I can do a million open/close pairs in 4 seconds on 
> a 2.5GHz G5. Maybe you tested a cold-cache case?

I measured after warming up for about a 100 times or so. It is
not a cold-cache case. I think we have a bigger problem in hand
here. I measured this with 2.6.13 and saw that I could do the
same in ~3 microseconds per iteration. It balloons to 12 microseconds
in 2.6.14-rc1. I am looking at this right now apart from the other
problems.


> I suspect this patch is worth it for the 2.6.14 timeframe, but I'll wait 
> for confirmation.
> 
> In fact, for 2.6.14, I'd almost do an even more minimal one. I agree with 
> your changing the file counter to an atomic, but I'd rather keep that 
> change for later.

Even beyond the file counter issue, we do need to address the DoS
and the open/close slowdown issue.

Thanks
Dipankar

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-17 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-15 13:19 VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached Serge Belyshev
2005-10-15 17:53 ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-16 16:23   ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-16 18:51     ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-16 18:56       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  2:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17  4:43           ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-17  8:32           ` Jean Delvare
2005-10-17  8:46             ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  9:10               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17  9:14                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-17  9:25                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 10:32                 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 12:10                   ` [RCU problem] was " Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 12:31                     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-17 12:36                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 13:28                       ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 13:33                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 14:54                         ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 15:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:01                     ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 16:16                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:29                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 18:01                           ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 18:31                             ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 19:00                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 18:37                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:12                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 19:30                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:39                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 20:14                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 20:25                                       ` Christopher Friesen
2005-10-17 20:24                                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-18 15:55                                           ` Christopher Friesen
2005-10-17 20:38                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 20:33                                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 22:40                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 22:59                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18  9:46                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-18 16:22                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-17 18:15                           ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 18:40                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:23                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 16:31                       ` Lee Revell
2005-10-17 16:20                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  2:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17  3:54       ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-17 11:54       ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051017115400.GC6257@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox