From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750798AbVJRROK (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:14:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750870AbVJRROK (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:14:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:2514 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750798AbVJRROJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:14:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:13:33 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb: Patch for USBDEVFS_IOCTL from 32-bit programs Message-ID: <20051018171333.GA29504@kroah.com> References: <20051017181554.77d0d45d.zaitcev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051017181554.77d0d45d.zaitcev@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I'm cross-posting to l-k because someone I know was making sounds at > a notion of #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT. But I think this solutions is superior > to adding anything outside of devio.c. Why not put this in fs/compat_ioctl.c where the other usbfs 32bit ioctls are? thanks, greg k-h