2.6.14-rc4 latency issue with rcu_process_callbacks()/file_free_rcu()

Dimitri Sivanich
2005-10-20T14:07:53Z

Just bringing up a latency issue I've noticed recently.

In or around 2.6.14-rc4 some changes were made to have the call to
kmem_cache_free() from file_free() in the Linux kernel be deferred, running
as a tasklet via file_free_rcu(), rather than running kmem_cache_free()
right from file_free() directly.

I've noticed that rcu_process_callbacks() can take quite a while to run
now that it routinely calls file_free_rcu() to run kmem_cache_free().
This can make the cpu unavailable for 100's of usec on 1GHz machines, with
or without preemption configured on (much of this path is non-preemptible).

This can result in some unpredictable periods of fairly long cpu latency,
such as when a thread is waiting to be woken by an interrupt handler on a
'now quiet' cpu. Changing file_free() to call kmem_cache_free() directly
completely eliminates this unexpected latency.

Here's the stack trace that illustrates what I'm talking about:

[<a0000001001154a0>] kmem_cache_free+0x140/0x3c0
sp=e00000307bc27dc0 bsp=e00000307bc21070
[<a000000100153950>] file_free_rcu+0x30/0x60
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc21050
[<a0000001000d89c0>] __rcu_process_callbacks+0x2c0/0x5e0
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc21010
[<a0000001000d8d40>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x60/0xc0
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc20fe8
[<a0000001000baae0>] tasklet_action+0x2c0/0x320
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc20f98
[<a0000001000ba0d0>] __do_softirq+0x130/0x240
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc20ef8
[<a0000001000ba260>] do_softirq+0x80/0xe0
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc20e98
[<a0000001000ba4a0>] ksoftirqd+0x140/0x1a0
sp=e00000307bc27dd0 bsp=e00000307bc20e68

Dimitri Sivanich