From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750903AbVJ2JWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:22:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750901AbVJ2JWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:22:52 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:60164 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750796AbVJ2JWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:22:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:22:50 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Ioan Ionita Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/reiser4/: possible cleanups Message-ID: <20051029092250.GG4180@stusta.de> References: <20051028223547.GF4180@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:58:40PM -0400, Ioan Ionita wrote: > When I read the Subject (*[2.6 patch] fs/reiser4/: possible cleanups)* for a > second, I thought that this patch was against Linus' tree. I concluded that > reiser4 must have been recently merged in mainline, since there's a patch > for it. But no, it's a -mm patch. Gah! Shouldn't the Subject be more like [ > 2.6-mm patch] as to not mislead us dreamers? It should have been [-mm patch], but everyone makes mistakes... cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed