From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932735AbVJ2XF3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:05:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932736AbVJ2XF3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:05:29 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:9362 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932735AbVJ2XF2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:05:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 01:05:15 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , linux-pm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] swsusp: rework swap handling Message-ID: <20051029230515.GE14209@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200510292158.11089.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510292158.11089.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I have divided the changes into some more or less logical steps for clarity. > Although the code has been designed as proof-of-concept, it is functional > and has been tested on x86-64, except for the cryptographic functionality > and error paths. Don't worry about crypto paths too much. It is my fault, I should not have taken them in the first place. Just ask ast for testing when you are reasonably confident it will work. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!