From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932161AbVJaPen (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:34:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932172AbVJaPen (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:34:43 -0500 Received: from amdext4.amd.com ([163.181.251.6]:52441 "EHLO amdext4.amd.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932161AbVJaPem (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:34:42 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: 8C3DB987-180B-4465-9446-45C15473FD3E Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:37:15 -0700 From: "Jordan Crouse" To: "Alan Cox" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, info-linux@ldcmail.amd.com Subject: Re: AMD Geode GX/LX Support (Refreshed) Message-ID: <20051031153715.GE20777@cosmic.amd.com> References: <20051028154430.GB19854@cosmic.amd.com> <1130711970.32734.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1130711970.32734.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-WSS-ID: 6F78E60935K3817125-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Does this mean you've now done actual performance analysis on whether > this is a good idea for Geode GX/LX ? I'm fairly sure that the ppro checksum is faster, but you're exactly right, we should publish some numbers. Mia culpa. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Senior Linux Engineer AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group