From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Commit "[PATCH] USB: Always do usb-handoff" breaks my powerbook
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:39:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200510312239.57601.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510311909.32694.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Monday 31 October 2005 22:09, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure it's legal to do pci_enable_device() from within a pci
> > > > quirk anyway. I really wonder what that code is doing in the quirks, I
> > > > don't think it's the right place, but I may be wrong.
> > >
> > > Erm, what "code is doing" what, that you mean ??
> >
> > What _That_ code is doing in the quirks... shouldn't it be in the
> > {U,O,E}HCI drivers instead ?
>
> Not for PCI. Vojtech, this is your cue to explain some of how late handoff
> borks the input layer, as observed by SuSE on way too many BIOS/hardware combos
> for me to remember ... :)
>
Not Vojtech, but here is goes... Not everyone has USB compiled in and
even then I think USB is registered after serio. So when we probe for
i8042 BIOS still has its dirty hands on USB controllers and pretends
that they are in fact PS/2 devices. Crazy stuff like that... That's
why we can't keep that code in HCI drivers.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-31 5:23 Commit "[PATCH] USB: Always do usb-handoff" breaks my powerbook Paul Mackerras
2005-11-01 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-01 1:41 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2005-11-01 2:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-01 3:09 ` David Brownell
2005-11-01 3:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-01 4:17 ` David Brownell
2005-11-01 4:52 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-01 5:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-01 9:28 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-01 13:40 ` Glenn Maynard
2005-11-01 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-01 3:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2005-11-01 4:06 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-11-01 4:39 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-02 4:21 Aleksey Gorelov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200510312239.57601.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox