From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com, greg@enjellic.com, mikew@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leimy2k@gmail.com
Subject: Re: /etc/mtab and per-process namespaces
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 02:44:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511010244.49532.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EWqgc-0006AY-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 01:36, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > (Then, of course, there's FUSE. Does killing the FUSE helper
> > prevent the mount from being umounted?)
>
> No. On clean exit (via INT, TERM, HUP handlers installed by library)
> it will lazy umount itself. Violent death of a filesystem daemon will
> leave the mount intact, but umountable.
Ok, so it sounds like the proper init-go-byebye procedure once namespaces get
deployed is for init to kill all child processes, umount -a what's left in
its namespace, and all is well. So no changes are needed to the umount -a
implementation...
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-22 13:23 /etc/mtab and per-process namespaces Dr. Greg Wettstein
2005-10-29 0:06 ` Ram Pai
2005-10-29 10:16 ` Rob Landley
2005-10-31 19:11 ` Ram Pai
2005-10-31 23:27 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 0:01 ` Ram Pai
2005-11-01 7:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-11-01 8:44 ` Rob Landley [this message]
[not found] <50rBX-76N-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <50rBX-76N-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-22 17:26 ` Bodo Eggert
[not found] <4TkbZ-6KJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4U0uy-33E-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4U0XK-3Gp-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-04 21:20 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-05 0:14 ` Al Viro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-02 22:08 David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:14 ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-04 19:49 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-10-04 19:52 ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 19:43 ` Al Viro
2005-10-04 20:07 ` David Leimbach
2005-10-04 20:20 ` Al Viro
2005-10-05 16:29 ` Ram
2005-10-14 2:10 ` Mike Waychison
2005-10-17 0:47 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-20 3:53 ` Rob Landley
2005-10-20 3:42 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511010244.49532.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=greg@enjellic.com \
--cc=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox