public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sct@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org,
	ext3-users@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:46:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101044658.GA7500@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051031212503.GY31368@schatzie.adilger.int>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:25:03PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2005  01:13 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK?
> > 
> > There is code for a "check" option for mount if these options are 
> > enabled, but there's no way to enable them.
> 
> These are expensive debugging options, which walk the inode/block bitmaps
> for getting the group inode/block usage instead of using the group
> summary data.  Not used very often but I suspect occasionally useful for
> developers mucking with ext[23] internals.  Since it is developer-only
> code it needs to be enabled with #define CONFIG_EXT[23]_CHECK in a
> header or compile option.

It's basically a stripped down version of e2fsck pass #5, though.  Is
there any reason why this needs to be in the kernel?  If it would be
useful I could easily make a userspace implementation of these checks.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-01  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-31  0:13 What is the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK? Adrian Bunk
2005-10-31 21:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-11-01  4:46   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2005-11-07 21:18     ` [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051101044658.GA7500@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox