From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750863AbVKAPWQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:22:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750860AbVKAPWP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:22:15 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:20755 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750755AbVKAPWP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:22:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:22:08 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: adaplas@pol.net, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: EXPORT_SYMBOL(screen_info) even #ifndef CONFIG_VT Message-ID: <20051101152207.GT8009@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The folllowing modules require screen_info but don't depend on CONFIG_VT: - vga16fb.ko - intelfb.ko Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- Is this patch OK or should the drivers depend on VT? --- linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1-modular-2.95/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.old 2005-11-01 16:10:52.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1-modular-2.95/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c 2005-11-01 16:11:25.000000000 +0100 @@ -129,9 +129,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drive_info); #endif struct screen_info screen_info; -#ifdef CONFIG_VT EXPORT_SYMBOL(screen_info); -#endif struct apm_info apm_info; EXPORT_SYMBOL(apm_info); struct sys_desc_table_struct {