From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: alex@alexfisher.me.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Would I be violating the GPL?
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:00:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511012000.21176.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5449aac20511010949x5d96c7e0meee4d76a67a06c01@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1073 bytes --]
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:49, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> Hello.
>
> A supplier of a PCI mezzanine digital IO card has provided a linux 2.4
> driver as source code. They have provided this code source with a
> license stating I won't redistribute it in anyway.
> My concern is that if I build this code into a module, I won't be able
> to distribute it to customers without violating either the GPL (by not
> distributing the source code), or the proprietary source code license
> as currently imposed by the supplier.
> From what I have read, this concern is only valid if the binary module
> is considered to be a 'derived work' of the kernel. The module source
> directly includes the following kernel headers :
Take the code and write a specification for the device.
Should be fairly easy.
Someone else will pick up the spec and write a clean GPLed driver.
Like these, without the reverse engineering part:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_wall#Computer_science
--
Greetings Michael.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-01 17:49 Would I be violating the GPL? Alexander Fisher
2005-11-01 16:43 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-01 19:15 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-16 15:26 ` David Schwartz
2005-11-16 16:39 ` Jeffrey V. Merkey
2005-11-01 20:32 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 20:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-01 19:00 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2005-11-01 17:44 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-01 19:12 ` Michael Buesch
2005-11-01 20:46 ` Alexander Fisher
2005-11-01 21:06 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-11-02 9:49 ` Giuliano Pochini
2005-11-02 14:54 ` Alex Lyashkov
2005-11-02 15:29 ` Nix
2005-11-02 15:42 ` Alex Lyashkov
2005-11-02 16:16 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-11-02 17:26 ` Nix
2005-11-02 15:55 ` Giuliano Pochini
2005-11-10 19:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-11-10 19:12 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-17 21:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-11-18 15:19 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-11-18 15:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-11-18 21:55 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-11-01 22:04 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-01 19:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-01 20:30 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-01 20:57 ` Alexander Fisher
2005-11-02 16:12 ` Stuart MacDonald
2005-11-03 12:44 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-02 22:21 linux
2005-11-02 22:47 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-11-03 3:50 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 0:57 ` Horst von Brand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511012000.21176.mbuesch@freenet.de \
--to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=alex@alexfisher.me.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox