* [2.6 patch] Documentation/arm/README: small update
@ 2005-08-24 10:36 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-28 17:17 ` Russell King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-08-24 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rmk; +Cc: linux-kernel
- egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
- Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm2-full/Documentation/arm/README.old 2005-08-24 11:51:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm2-full/Documentation/arm/README 2005-08-24 11:51:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
---------------------
In order to compile ARM Linux, you will need a compiler capable of
- generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 2.95.1, EGCS
- 1.1.2, and GCC 3.3 are known to be good compilers. Fortunately, you
+ generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 2.95.3 and
+ GCC 3.3 are known to be good compilers. Fortunately, you
needn't guess. The kernel will report an error if your compiler is
a recognized offender.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] Documentation/arm/README: small update
2005-08-24 10:36 Adrian Bunk
@ 2005-08-28 17:17 ` Russell King
2005-09-02 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2005-08-28 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:36:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
Ok.
> - Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
No idea - I've given up tracking what compilers work and don't work on
the grounds that I'm too scared to change my compiler! gcc 3.3 works
fine here which is the only version I use (until it's proven far too
buggy through local experience).
That probably means we should say "at least GCC 3.3" though I'm not
sure if that's entirely accurate.
Toolchains are just pure evil as far as stability on ARM goes.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [2.6 patch] Documentation/arm/README: small update
2005-08-28 17:17 ` Russell King
@ 2005-09-02 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-09-02 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 06:17:50PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:36:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > - egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
>
> Ok.
>
> > - Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
>
> No idea - I've given up tracking what compilers work and don't work on
> the grounds that I'm too scared to change my compiler! gcc 3.3 works
> fine here which is the only version I use (until it's proven far too
> buggy through local experience).
>
> That probably means we should say "at least GCC 3.3" though I'm not
> sure if that's entirely accurate.
>
> Toolchains are just pure evil as far as stability on ARM goes.
What about the patch below to simply recommend gcc 3.3?
It doesn't imply other compilers weren't usable and removes the
references to the older compilers.
> Russell King
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
- egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
- gcc 3.3 seems to be a good choice on ARM
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.13-mm1-full/Documentation/arm/README.old 2005-09-03 00:02:55.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-mm1-full/Documentation/arm/README 2005-09-03 00:03:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -8,10 +8,9 @@
---------------------
In order to compile ARM Linux, you will need a compiler capable of
- generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 2.95.1, EGCS
- 1.1.2, and GCC 3.3 are known to be good compilers. Fortunately, you
- needn't guess. The kernel will report an error if your compiler is
- a recognized offender.
+ generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 3.3 is known to be
+ a good compiler. Fortunately, you needn't guess. The kernel will report
+ an error if your compiler is a recognized offender.
To build ARM Linux natively, you shouldn't have to alter the ARCH = line
in the top level Makefile. However, if you don't have the ARM Linux ELF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [2.6 patch] Documentation/arm/README: small update
@ 2005-11-02 18:34 Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-11-02 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Russell King, linux-kernel
- egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
- gcc 3.3 seems to be a good choice on ARM
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 3 Sep 2005
--- linux-2.6.13-mm1-full/Documentation/arm/README.old 2005-09-03 00:02:55.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-mm1-full/Documentation/arm/README 2005-09-03 00:03:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -8,10 +8,9 @@
---------------------
In order to compile ARM Linux, you will need a compiler capable of
- generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 2.95.1, EGCS
- 1.1.2, and GCC 3.3 are known to be good compilers. Fortunately, you
- needn't guess. The kernel will report an error if your compiler is
- a recognized offender.
+ generating ARM ELF code with GNU extensions. GCC 3.3 is known to be
+ a good compiler. Fortunately, you needn't guess. The kernel will report
+ an error if your compiler is a recognized offender.
To build ARM Linux natively, you shouldn't have to alter the ARCH = line
in the top level Makefile. However, if you don't have the ARM Linux ELF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-02 18:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-02 18:34 [2.6 patch] Documentation/arm/README: small update Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-24 10:36 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-28 17:17 ` Russell King
2005-09-02 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox