public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Edgar Hucek <hostmaster@ed-soft.at>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:44:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051105134409.GF5368@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436CB162.5070100@ed-soft.at>

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:19:30PM +0100, Edgar Hucek wrote:

> Hi.

Hi Edgar,

> Sorry for not posting my Name.
> 
> Maybe you don't understand what i wanted to say or it's my bad english.
> The ipw2200 driver was only an example. I had also problems with, vmware,
> unionfs...
> What i mean ist, that kernel developers make incompatible changes to the 
> header
> files, change structures, interfaces and so on. Which makes the kernel 
> releases
> incompatible.

you've already been given a pointer to the                               
Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt document in the kernel sources 
that explains these issues.

> There are several reasons why modules are not in the mainline kernel and 
> will never
> get there. So saying, bring modules to the kernel is wrong.

It's not wrong.

Every vendor of any kind of software will tell you A is supported and 
B is not supported.

It's a consensus among the Linux kernel developers that the Linux kernel 
does not support a stable API for external modules.

You don't have to like this decision, but stable_api_nonsense.txt 
explains it.

If you dislike this decision, there are several other operating systems 
whose vendors do offer a stable API for external modules.

> The right way would be to take care of defined interfaces, header files, 
> and so on.
> Otherwise you could only say the kernel 2.6.14 is only compatible to 
> 2.6.14.X and
> you there is no stable 2.6 mainline kernel.

The 2.6 is a stable kernel series in the sense that it doesn't crash 
very often.

2.6.14 is not API-compatible with 2.6.15.

But this has always been this way, the new development model only brings 
more API changes than the previous development models.

> I think it's also no task for the user, to search the net why external 
> driver xyz not
> works with a new kernel ( because of incompatibilties ). Basicly in new 
> kernel there
> could be a chance for the user a driver works better, because a bug was 
> fixed in the
> kernel.
>...

I do agree, this is not a task for the user.

It's a task for the vendors of the external modules.

> cu
> 
> ED.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-05 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-05  9:42 New Linux Development Model hostmaster
2005-11-05 10:29 ` Francois Romieu
2005-11-05 11:29 ` Jean Delvare
2005-11-05 13:19   ` Edgar Hucek
2005-11-05 13:44     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-11-05 13:47     ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-05 22:23       ` Mark Lord
2005-11-06  0:28         ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-05 14:34     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-11-05 14:48       ` Oliver Neukum
2005-11-05 14:56         ` Fawad Lateef
2005-11-05 15:28         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-06 10:52     ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-06 11:55       ` Edgar Hucek
2005-11-06 12:39         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-06 12:57         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-06 17:38         ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]       ` <436DEEFC.4020301@ed-soft.at>
2005-11-06 13:43         ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-09  0:11           ` caszonyi
2005-11-09  0:23             ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-09  7:00               ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-09 12:30             ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-09 14:03               ` caszonyi
2005-11-09 15:45                 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-06 16:50       ` John Carlson
2005-11-06 18:17     ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-09  0:16       ` caszonyi
2005-11-06 15:22 ` Jim Nance
2005-11-06 16:55   ` John Carlson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-09  1:47 Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 11:08 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-09 11:30   ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 12:03     ` Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:03:07 +0100
2005-11-09 15:49       ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 15:58         ` Al Viro
2005-11-09 16:32           ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 12:37     ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-09 16:01       ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-10  0:55         ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 15:10           ` Mark Lord
2005-11-10 19:29             ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 19:47               ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 19:05   ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-09 20:10     ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-10  0:57       ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 20:08         ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-10 20:21           ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-12 13:45       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051105134409.GF5368@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=hostmaster@ed-soft.at \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox