public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, suzannew@cs.pdx.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Additional/catchup RCU signal fixes for -mm
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:02:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051106230202.GD22876@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436E1731.16CFAE41@tv-sign.ru>

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:46:09PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > 
> > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > >
> > > +       if (p->sighand == NULL) {
> > > +               ret = 1;
> > 
> > Oh, I think there is another problem here. I'll post a separate
> > message.
> 
> Sorry, I was not clear. This problem is unrelated. Yes, I think we
> should drop the signal. But please note that ret = 1 (sig_ignored)
> means (surprise!) "reschedule and re-arm this timer right now" in
> cpu-timer case. It is not critical, but may be ret = 0 is better.

OK.  Seems like the next firing of the timer would then see the
changed situation, so the current code should at least be safe.

Thoughts?

						Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-06 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-05  1:36 [PATCH] Additional/catchup RCU signal fixes for -mm Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-05 16:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06  1:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-06 14:17     ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 14:46       ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 23:02         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-11-06 14:32     ` Posix timers vs exec problems Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-07 18:12       ` [PATCH] fix de_thread() vs send_group_sigqueue() race Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-08 20:36         ` Chris Wright
2005-11-08 20:55           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-16 23:26       ` [PATCH] sigaction should clear all signals on SIG_IGN, not just < 32 George Anzinger
2005-11-22  1:09         ` Thread group exec race -> null pointer... HELP George Anzinger
2005-11-22 14:45           ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-23 20:30             ` George Anzinger
2005-11-25 15:03               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-22 19:20           ` [PATCH] fix do_wait() vs exec() race Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051106230202.GD22876@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=suzannew@cs.pdx.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox