public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-mm1
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:02:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051107170253.GA17785@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511071315530.1387@scrub.home>

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:18:26PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > gosh.  Can we please get one of the patches to allow m68k in mainline
> > merged?  roman has been blocking these since 2.6.13 at least.  Alternatively
> > just kill m68k from mainline due to lack of active maintainer.
> 
> It's not a problem on my part, Al is constantly vetoing these patches.
> I'm not taking this blame. :-(

You've threatened all kinds of nasty things in case Al's perfectly reasonable
patchkit goes in.  That's certainly what I would call blocking.  Your patch
split has clear disadvantages over the original ones, but I don't really
care which one we get as long as we get this bullshit sorted out.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-07 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-07  2:24 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07  3:25 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07  6:12   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07  6:34     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Herbert Xu
2005-11-07  3:30 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07 12:18   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Roman Zippel
2005-11-07 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-11-07 17:23       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Roman Zippel
2005-11-07 12:41   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-11-07  4:04 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Brice Goglin
2005-11-07  4:10 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07  6:07   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07  8:24   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Benoit Boissinot
2005-11-07  9:54 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 10:09   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 10:26     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Neil Brown
2005-11-07 10:37       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 10:44         ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 18:52           ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 19:27             ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alan Stern
2005-11-07 21:43             ` 2.6.14-mm1 J.A. Magallon
2005-11-08  0:07               ` 2.6.14-mm1 J.A. Magallon
2005-11-08 14:21             ` 2.6.14-mm1 James Bottomley
2005-11-09  0:30               ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 12:00 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Jiri Slaby
2005-11-07 15:04   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dustin Kirkland
2005-11-07 15:11     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Jiri Slaby
2005-11-07 16:15 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-11-07 19:52   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 20:07     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Greg KH
2005-11-07 20:30       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-07 20:21     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-11-07 20:40       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-07 20:46       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11  9:32         ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
     [not found]           ` <437472DA.4090001@linuxfromscratch.org>
2005-11-11 11:50             ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-11-07 17:37 ` 2.6.14-mm1: drivers/pci/hotplug/: namespace clashes Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 18:41   ` Rajesh Shah
2005-11-07 20:03     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 21:37       ` Rajesh Shah
2005-11-07 21:10 ` 2.6.14-mm1: Why is USB_LIBUSUAL user-visible? Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 21:52   ` Greg KH
2005-11-07 22:26     ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-11-07 22:28       ` Greg KH
2005-11-08  0:47         ` [-mm patch] USB_LIBUSUAL shouldn't be user-visible Adrian Bunk
2005-11-09 22:28           ` Greg KH
2005-11-10  6:41             ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-10 10:56               ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 23:46                 ` Greg KH
2005-11-11  2:09                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11  6:13                     ` Greg KH
2005-11-11  9:31                     ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-10 12:11               ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-11  9:14           ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-07 23:34   ` 2.6.14-mm1: Why is USB_LIBUSUAL user-visible? Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-07 22:28 ` 2.6.14-mm1 - cpufreq build problem Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-08  4:36 ` [-mm patch] __deprecated_for_modules the lookup_hash() prototype Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 13:07 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Serge Hallyn
     [not found]   ` <OFE00FE25C.725B5669-ON872570B5.0066EFF0-862570B5.00679646@us.ibm.com>
2005-11-11 17:59     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Serge Hallyn
2005-11-14 17:05       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Greg KH
2005-11-12  0:31 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-12  0:51   ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-12  1:30     ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-12  1:47       ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-12 18:00         ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051107170253.GA17785@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox