From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Calin Szonyi <caszonyi@rdslink.ro>
Cc: jerome lacoste <jerome.lacoste@gmail.com>,
Edgar Hucek <hostmaster@ed-soft.at>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:23:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511091123.52092.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511090202030.2383@grinch.ro>
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:11 am, caszonyi@rdslink.ro wrote:
> There are other reasons for using a new kernel. One of them is
> interactivity. In the days of 2.4 one could achieve decent interactivity
> for the desktop using preempt and low latency patches. For 2.6
> interactivity was a real issue (possibly because of the new development
> model).
Eh? Where are the bug reports for this? I've only seen better interactivity
and responsiveness with 2.6.
The only time I've seen bad behaviour repeatedly on forums and elsewhere has
been due to misconfigured IDE drivers not using DMA and X servers still
reniced to -10.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-05 9:42 New Linux Development Model hostmaster
2005-11-05 10:29 ` Francois Romieu
2005-11-05 11:29 ` Jean Delvare
2005-11-05 13:19 ` Edgar Hucek
2005-11-05 13:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-05 13:47 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-05 22:23 ` Mark Lord
2005-11-06 0:28 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-05 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-11-05 14:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-11-05 14:56 ` Fawad Lateef
2005-11-05 15:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-06 10:52 ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-06 11:55 ` Edgar Hucek
2005-11-06 12:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-06 12:57 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-06 17:38 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <436DEEFC.4020301@ed-soft.at>
2005-11-06 13:43 ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-09 0:11 ` caszonyi
2005-11-09 0:23 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-11-09 7:00 ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-09 12:30 ` jerome lacoste
2005-11-09 14:03 ` caszonyi
2005-11-09 15:45 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-06 16:50 ` John Carlson
2005-11-06 18:17 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-09 0:16 ` caszonyi
2005-11-06 15:22 ` Jim Nance
2005-11-06 16:55 ` John Carlson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-09 1:47 Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 11:08 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-09 11:30 ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 12:03 ` Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:03:07 +0100
2005-11-09 15:49 ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 15:58 ` Al Viro
2005-11-09 16:32 ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 12:37 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-09 16:01 ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-10 0:55 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 15:10 ` Mark Lord
2005-11-10 19:29 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 19:47 ` Ian Kumlien
2005-11-09 19:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-09 20:10 ` Marcos Marado
2005-11-10 0:57 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-10 20:08 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-10 20:21 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-12 13:45 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511091123.52092.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=caszonyi@rdslink.ro \
--cc=hostmaster@ed-soft.at \
--cc=jerome.lacoste@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox