From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:28:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110042857.38b4635b.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051107200336.GH3847@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
> Currently, using an undeclared function gives a compile warning, but it
> can lead to a nasty runtime error if the prototype of the function is
> different from what gcc guessed.
>
> With -Werror-implicit-function-declaration, we are getting an immediate
> compile error instead.
>
> There will be some compile errors in cases where compilation previously
> worked because the undefined function wasn't called due to gcc dead code
> elimination, but in these cases a proper fix doesnt harm.
>
Sorry, I need to build allmodconfig kernels on wacky architectures (eg
ppc64) and this patch is killing me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-10 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 20:03 [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 12:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-11-11 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 3:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-11 20:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 4:52 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 13:48 ` Al Viro
2005-11-16 3:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-12 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-12 4:34 ` [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 21:24 ` [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-12 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-07 17:10 Luck, Tony
2006-07-06 16:37 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 18:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-06 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-07 3:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 5:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-07 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:53 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-07 7:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-07 9:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-06-28 16:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:34 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-24 0:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 14:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:18 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:38 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 16:52 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-30 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-30 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-30 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051110042857.38b4635b.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox