From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: latest mtd changes broke collie
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:16:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051111001617.GD9905@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4373DEB4.5070406@mvista.com>
Hi!
> >With these hacks, I'm able to mount flash at least read-only. On
> >attempt to remount read-write, I get
> >
> >"Write error in obliterating obsoleted node at 0x00bc0000: -30
> >...
> >Erase at 0x00c00000 failed immediately: -EROFS. Is the sector locked?"
> >
> >Is it good news?
>
> I see the old sharp driver has a normally-not-defined AUTOUNLOCK symbol
> that would enable some code to unlock blocks before writing/erasing
> (which isn't recommended since the code doesn't know the policy on
> whether the block is supposed to be locked). The tree previously in use
> may have had something similar setup. It seems these flashes have all
> blocks locked by default at power up.
Is there some quick hack I can do in kernel to unlock it? Is it
possible to accidentally unlock "BIOS" area and brick the device?
> Try flash_unlock /dev/mtdX before remounting. More automatic means of
> handling this are still under debate, I need to try another stab at
> resolving that soon.
Good news is that I do have /dev/mtdX. Bad news is I do not have
flash_unlock. Does anyone have binary suitable for arm, preferably
statically linked?
> Looks like you're close to obsoleting the pre-CFI Sharp flash driver,
> it's good news...
Ok, good. Read-only access is certainly better than nothing, and might
even be enough. Sharp shipped it with flash read-only originally.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 22:17 latest mtd changes broke collie Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 0:19 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-10 9:48 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 2:59 ` Todd Poynor
2005-11-10 9:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-10 10:38 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 10:51 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-10 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 11:11 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-10 11:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 12:07 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 13:02 ` David Vrabel
2005-11-10 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 17:41 ` Richard Purdie
2005-11-10 18:09 ` Richard Purdie
2005-11-10 22:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-10 23:58 ` Todd Poynor
2005-11-11 0:16 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-11-11 7:01 ` Ian Campbell
2005-11-12 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-13 10:35 ` Ian Campbell
2005-11-14 12:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-13 19:40 ` Todd Poynor
2005-11-14 12:08 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051111001617.GD9905@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox