From: Claudio Scordino <cloud.of.andor@gmail.com>
To: "Hua Zhong \(hzhong\)" <hzhong@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getrusage sucks
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:23:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511110123.29664.cloud.of.andor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82BCF2FD4@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
On Friday 11 November 2005 00:47, Hua Zhong (hzhong) wrote:
> The reason is what if tsk is no longer available when you call
> getrusage?
Sorry, but honestly I don't see any problem: as you can see from my patch, if
tsk is no longer available, getrusage returns -1 and sets errno appropriately
(equal to EINVAL, which means that who is invalid).
Claudio
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Does exist any _real_ reason why getrusage can't be invoked
> > by a task to know
> > statistics of another task ?
> >
> > The changes would be very trivial, as shown by the following patch.
> >
> > Claudio
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> > --- a/kernel/sys.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> > @@ -1746,9 +1746,13 @@ int getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int
> >
> > asmlinkage long sys_getrusage(int who, struct rusage __user *ru)
> > {
> > - if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - return getrusage(current, who, ru);
> > + if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN) {
> > + struct task_struct* tsk = find_task_by_pid(who);
> > + if (tsk == NULL)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + return getrusage(tsk, RUSAGE_SELF, ru);
> > + } else
> > + return getrusage(current, who, ru);
> > }
> >
> > asmlinkage long sys_umask(int mask)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-10 23:47 [PATCH] getrusage sucks Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-11 0:23 ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
2005-11-11 0:32 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2005-11-11 1:11 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 22:38 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:23 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:02 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-11 23:44 ` David Wagner
2005-11-12 0:53 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-12 6:37 ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 23:58 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:49 ` dean gaudet
2005-11-12 1:10 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-12 15:10 ` making makefile for 2.6 kernel anil dahiya
2005-11-12 15:16 ` anil dahiya
2005-11-12 22:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-13 1:34 ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-15 16:56 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-15 17:00 ` New getrusage Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:08 ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:41 ` David Wagner
2005-11-15 1:08 ` Peter Chubb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-15 18:25 linux
2005-11-11 23:49 Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-10 22:34 Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 5:06 ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 19:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-11 19:13 ` David Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511110123.29664.cloud.of.andor@gmail.com \
--to=cloud.of.andor@gmail.com \
--cc=hzhong@cisco.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox