From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:18:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051111201849.GP5376@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051110182443.514622ed.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:24:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:28:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currently, using an undeclared function gives a compile warning, but it
> > > > can lead to a nasty runtime error if the prototype of the function is
> > > > different from what gcc guessed.
> > > >
> > > > With -Werror-implicit-function-declaration, we are getting an immediate
> > > > compile error instead.
> > > >
> > > > There will be some compile errors in cases where compilation previously
> > > > worked because the undefined function wasn't called due to gcc dead code
> > > > elimination, but in these cases a proper fix doesnt harm.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I need to build allmodconfig kernels on wacky architectures (eg
> > > ppc64) and this patch is killing me.
> >
> > Can you send me the list of compile errors so that I can work on fixing
> > them?
> >
>
> No handily, sorry. Missing virt_to_bus() is the typical problem.
>
But in this case -Werror-implicit-function-declaration doesn't create
new compile errors, it only moves compile errors from compile time to
link or depmod time - which is IMHO not a bad change.
If you really want to keep the status quo, you can still steal the
following from sparc64:
extern unsigned long virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
#define virt_to_bus virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map
extern unsigned long bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
#define bus_to_virt bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map
Would a patch to mark the ISA legacy functions as __deprecated be OK?
This might give some motivation for people to convert drivers and would
avoid new code like the recently introduced kexec to use this obsolete
API.
> The cross-tools at http://developer.osdl.org/dev/plm/cross_compile/ are
> quite simple to install.
Thanks, I've tried it.
Other problems I found until I gave up on compiling:
- a problem in sk98lin indirectly corrected by my SkPciWriteCfgDWord()
patch
- drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/: missing #include <linux/vmalloc.h>'s
(see my patch) - this seems to be a real bug
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 20:03 [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 12:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 3:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-11 20:18 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-11-11 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 4:52 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 13:48 ` Al Viro
2005-11-16 3:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-12 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-12 4:34 ` [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 21:24 ` [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-12 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-07 17:10 Luck, Tony
2006-07-06 16:37 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 18:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-06 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-07 3:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 5:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-07 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:53 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-07 7:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-07 9:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-06-28 16:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:34 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-24 0:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 14:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:18 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:38 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 16:52 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-30 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-30 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-30 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051111201849.GP5376@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox