From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:36:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051111203601.GR5376@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051111202005.GQ5376@stusta.de>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:20:05PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:18:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> > But in this case -Werror-implicit-function-declaration doesn't create
> > new compile errors, it only moves compile errors from compile time to
> > link or depmod time - which is IMHO not a bad change.
> >
> > If you really want to keep the status quo, you can still steal the
> > following from sparc64:
> > extern unsigned long virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
> > #define virt_to_bus virt_to_bus_not_defined_use_pci_map
> > extern unsigned long bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map(volatile void *addr);
> > #define bus_to_virt bus_to_virt_not_defined_use_pci_map
> >
> > Would a patch to mark the ISA legacy functions as __deprecated be OK?
> >...
>
> Sorry, this were two separate thoughts:
>
> Would a patch to mark both virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt and the ISA legacy
> functions (that cause similar problems) as __deprecated be OK?
Rethinking about this:
The ISA legacy functions were declared obsolete five years ago.
Since there are not many drivers using them, we could simply mark the
drivers still using them as BROKEN.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 20:03 [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 12:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 3:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-11 20:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-11-12 4:52 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove ISA legacy functions Adrian Bunk
2005-11-12 5:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 5:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-12 5:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-12 13:48 ` Al Viro
2005-11-16 3:56 ` Al Viro
2005-11-12 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-12 4:34 ` [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 21:24 ` [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 23:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-12 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-07 17:10 Luck, Tony
2006-07-06 16:37 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 18:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-06 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-07 3:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 5:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-07 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:53 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-07 7:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-07 9:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-06-28 16:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:34 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-24 0:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 14:54 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:18 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-30 16:38 ` Olaf Hering
2005-08-30 16:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 16:52 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-30 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-30 18:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-30 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-30 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051111203601.GR5376@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox