From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: David Wagner <daw-usenet@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getrusage sucks
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:53:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051112005333.GC7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dl3ad7$ikf$2@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
* David Wagner (daw@cs.berkeley.edu) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> >It's already available via /proc w/out protection. And ditto via posix
> >cpu timers.
>
> If so, maybe that code should be fixed. Where exactly in /proc would
> I find the getrusage() info of another process?
Just from /proc/[pid]/stat. (fs/proc/array.c::do_task_stat).
> Is there any argument
> that disclosing it to everyone is safe? Or is it just that no one has
> ever given the security considerations much thought up till now?
I guess it keeps falling in the "too theoretical" category. It can be
protected by policy, but default is open.
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-12 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-10 23:47 [PATCH] getrusage sucks Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-11 0:23 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 0:32 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2005-11-11 1:11 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 22:38 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:23 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:02 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-11 23:44 ` David Wagner
2005-11-12 0:53 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-11-12 6:37 ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 23:58 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:49 ` dean gaudet
2005-11-12 1:10 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-12 15:10 ` making makefile for 2.6 kernel anil dahiya
2005-11-12 15:16 ` anil dahiya
2005-11-12 22:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-13 1:34 ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-15 16:56 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-15 17:00 ` New getrusage Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:08 ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:41 ` David Wagner
2005-11-15 1:08 ` Peter Chubb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-15 18:25 linux
2005-11-11 23:49 Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-10 22:34 Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 5:06 ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 19:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-11 19:13 ` David Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051112005333.GC7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=daw-usenet@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox