public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Scordino <cloud.of.andor@gmail.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag@fbab.net>,
	"Hua Zhong (hzhong)" <hzhong@cisco.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org,
	David Wagner <daw@cs.berkeley.edu>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getrusage sucks
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:34:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511130234.19733.cloud.of.andor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051112011006.GD7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>

On Saturday 12 November 2005 02:10, Chris Wright wrote:
> * dean gaudet (dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org) wrote:
> > do you have a use case for this new code?
>
> I'm with Dean.  What problem are you trying to solve?

I just want to improve getrusage to account for the case in which a server 
process needs to have usage information about client processes at run-time.
In this case RUSAGE_SELF is more important than RUSAGE_CHILDREN.
I think it would be an useful feature for some user-level applications.

At the beginning, I didn't want to propose any different prototype for the 
function, even if I think that a more general (and correct) one would be

      int getrusage(int who, struct rusage *usage, pid_t pid);

which accounts for all the situations we discussed so far.

However, I've added a more restrictive check (as asked by David) and the goto 
proposed by Hua. Is now the patch right ? Do you think that it's useful ?

Many thanks,

            Claudio


diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1746,9 +1746,29 @@ int getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int
 
 asmlinkage long sys_getrusage(int who, struct rusage __user *ru)
 {
- if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN)
-  return -EINVAL;
- return getrusage(current, who, ru);
+        struct rusage r;
+        struct task_struct* tsk = current;
+        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+        if ((who != RUSAGE_SELF) && (who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN)) {
+                tsk = find_task_by_pid(who);
+                if ((tsk == NULL) || (who <=0)) 
+                        goto bad;
+                if (((current->uid != tsk->euid) ||
+                     (current->uid != tsk->suid) ||
+                     (current->uid != tsk->uid) ||
+                     (current->gid != tsk->egid) ||
+                     (current->gid != tsk->sgid) ||
+                     (current->gid != tsk->gid)) && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
+                        goto bad;
+                who = RUSAGE_SELF;
+        }
+        k_getrusage(tsk, who, &r);
+        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+        return copy_to_user(ru, &r, sizeof(r)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+
+ bad:
+        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+        return tsk ? -EPERM : -EINVAL;
 }
 
 asmlinkage long sys_umask(int mask)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-13  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-10 23:47 [PATCH] getrusage sucks Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-11  0:23 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11  0:32   ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2005-11-11  1:11     ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 13:30       ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 22:38         ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:23           ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:02             ` Chris Wright
2005-11-11 23:44               ` David Wagner
2005-11-12  0:53                 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-12  6:37                   ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 23:58               ` Alan Cox
2005-11-11 23:43                 ` Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:49                   ` dean gaudet
2005-11-12  1:10                     ` Chris Wright
2005-11-12 15:10                       ` making makefile for 2.6 kernel anil dahiya
2005-11-12 15:16                       ` anil dahiya
2005-11-12 22:19                         ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-11-13  1:34                       ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
2005-11-15 16:56                       ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-15 17:00                       ` New getrusage Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:08             ` [PATCH] getrusage sucks Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11 23:41           ` David Wagner
2005-11-15  1:08       ` Peter Chubb
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-15 18:25 linux
2005-11-11 23:49 Hua Zhong (hzhong)
2005-11-10 22:34 Claudio Scordino
2005-11-11  5:06 ` David Wagner
2005-11-11 19:09   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-11 19:13     ` David Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511130234.19733.cloud.of.andor@gmail.com \
    --to=cloud.of.andor@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=daw@cs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
    --cc=hzhong@cisco.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mag@fbab.net \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox